Ask your whole discovery set one question — and trust the answer

You've got a phone number from an FBI 302 and you need every place it appears across 230,000 files — texts, call logs, emails, other reports. Right now that means the review tool, one search at a time per file type, missing anything a scan never captured, and no way to be sure you actually covered everything.

One way it plays out

1. The whole production gets ingested once, up front — every file, including scanned reports and photographed pages, is made searchable on the way in, so a number buried in a scanned page turns up the same as one in a native PDF. Bates numbers and original paths are preserved, so every hit points back to exactly where it sits.
2. You ask across everything, and get results in seconds — type the number and get back the documents that mention it, each with the surrounding text highlighted, the Bates range, and the file path.
3. You can ask in plain language, and it quotes its sources — "does anything connect this number to the warrant application?" comes back quoting the specific documents that establish the connection, citing each — and it says plainly when it found nothing else, rather than guessing.

That's one way it plays out — the formats, the fields, and the kinds of questions get shaped around your production.

So instead of hoping a folder-by-folder search caught everything, you can stand behind the answer — nothing invented, every result traceable to a specific document, and anything the files don't support flagged as unsupported.

Works for: criminal defense discovery review, Brady/Giglio tracking, complex litigation document search — any practice buried in unreviewed production.

Everything stays on servers here in Canada, and once it's built the whole thing is yours to keep — not a subscription, and not tied to anyone's platform. I'm here in Winnipeg: I set it up, and I stay with you and your team until it's running the way you want.

Curious how it's built? Technical breakdown available on request.